SEARCH
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Prev | Current Page 444 | Next

Margaret K. Kulpa, Kent A. Johnson

"Interpreting the CMMI: A Process Improvement Approach, Second Edition"


PI Structure
The PI reporting structure is as follows. Each member of the EPG (except for the PI project leader
and PI consultant) will serve as the chairman (or lead) of each PAT. This structure allows for an
e?¬?ective ?¬‚ow of information from the EPG to each PAT, from each PAT to the EPG, and for
sharing information among the di?¬?erent PATs. Each PAT will exist only on a temporary basis.
As the activities detailed in the Action Plan for each PAT are accomplished, that PAT will be
dissolved. The members of that PAT will then be assigned other PI tasks. PAT teams will consist
of the EPG representative (as PAT lead) plus other members of the organization, as necessary. For
example, if one of the tasks in the Action Plan is to generate Con?¬?guration Management standards,
a PAT will be established for that purpose.
table 15.6a example engineering Process Group (ePG) Charter.
206 n Interpreting the CMMI
Title: Engineering Process Group Charter
Rev B, March 14, 2007
Continued:
The PAT lead may request help in this area from other organizational individuals knowledgeable
in con?¬?guration management standards used both at xxx and across the industry.


Pages:
432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456