SEARCH
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Prev | Current Page 460 | Next

Margaret K. Kulpa, Kent A. Johnson

"Interpreting the CMMI: A Process Improvement Approach, Second Edition"

In
addition, one of the common features??”Directing Implementation??”also addresses
measurement. Just like the CMMI presupposes that you have standards and are
using them, the CMMI also presupposes that you are collecting appropriate metrics
about your project (for example, schedule and cost overruns, people turnover
on your project, number of errors in deliverables submitted and returned from the
client, etc.). This is often not the case. In fact, in some organizations just beginning
the process improvement journey, no metrics are kept! While that may shock some
of you, there are large state and local agencies that have no timekeeping systems;
there are some publicly held companies that do not track dollars spent on projects
that are contracted out; and the reverse, companies that only track contractor work,
not their own, internal commitments.
The CMMI specifically relates its metrics to the process area (PA) activities;
for example, how long it took you to plan your planning activities (in the Project
Planning PA), how long it took to write the Quality Assurance Plan (in the Product
and Process Assurance PA), and so forth.


Pages:
448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472