Mini-teams are optionally given authority to
reach consensus on practice implementation for each instance. The entire team
remains responsible for consensus at the organizational unit-level. This is a change
over most previous methods that required the entire team to conduct interviews.
Allowing mini-teams to interview independently may result in low quality or
inconsistent results during late-night roll ups of findings. The mini-teams must be
formed based on trust and experience working with the SCAMPI A team members.
It is not unusual for a mini-team to interview an individual, and come back and
report to the rest of the SCAMPI A team. The SCAMPI A team may then respond
by asking, ???Well, did you then follow-up with a question about x or y or z???? The
mini-team says no. The mini-team may also be allowed too much freedom. For
example, the SCAMPI Lead Appraiser may allow the mini-team to interview one
project manager, and another mini-team to interview another project manager and
another mini-team to interview yet another project manager.
Pages:
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603