SEARCH
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Prev | Current Page 652 | Next

Margaret K. Kulpa, Kent A. Johnson

"Interpreting the CMMI: A Process Improvement Approach, Second Edition"

e., to save time and that this approach is the preferred
method in the MDD).
In our appraisals, we find that only listing and presenting weaknesses can be
counterproductive and discouraging to the organization. To overcome this problem,
we make use of the optional practice for including statements of strengths for
exemplary implementations of model practices to present a number of strengths
along with the weaknesses in order to provide a more balanced view to the organization.
This inclusion of strengths does not take a lot of extra time because organizations
will argue the weaknesses found, but have never (in our experience) argued
the strengths found. It also prevents lynchings of the Appraisal Team.
There are other methods that may be used to validate preliminary findings.
They are the use of focus groups and survey instruments. We do not go into these
alternatives in this chapter. Those individuals interested in these methods may
review them in the MDD.
314 n Interpreting the CMMI
Generate Appraisal Results Process
In this process, the Appraisal Team generates the final SCAMPI A Appraisal results.


Pages:
640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664