SEARCH
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Prev | Current Page 772 | Next

Margaret K. Kulpa, Kent A. Johnson

"Interpreting the CMMI: A Process Improvement Approach, Second Edition"

Was an evaluation plan prepared?
9. Did the plan contain evaluation and measurement criteria?
10. Were key factors for evaluation identified?
11. Were all affected parties identified?
12. Were plans made to consider and include (as appropriate) the opinions and
reactions of the affected parties pertaining to the results of the pilot?
13. Was provision made for collecting and analyzing cost-benefit
information?
14. Was there an analysis identifying appropriate cost and benefit
information?
Conduct
15. Was the primary focus of the pilot on evaluating the process/issue/
approach addressed in the pilot, or was the motivation for the pilot biased
in any way?
16. Were pilot results documented?
17. Were lessons learned recorded?
18. Is associated documentation adequate?
19. Were feedback mechanisms implemented to foster proper evaluation of
the pilot?
20. Were all affected parties/constituencies approached for their reactions?
21. Were these reactions documented and analyzed?
22. Was cost-benefit information collected and analyzed?
Evaluation
23.


Pages:
760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784