SEARCH
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Prev | Current Page 773 | Next

Margaret K. Kulpa, Kent A. Johnson

"Interpreting the CMMI: A Process Improvement Approach, Second Edition"

Was there a documented evaluation phase?
24. Was there a serious attempt to evaluate the pilot results?
25. Were the reactions of affected parties collected and analyzed?
26. Were recommendations resulting from the pilot based on lessons learned
and not on personal/political biases?
27. Was there a formal decision-making process regarding the future use of
the pilots in the organization?
384 n Appendix C: Checklists for Pilot Projects
28. Was there a formal decision-making process regarding the future use of
the results of this pilot in the organization?
29. Were costs and benefits compared?
30. To what extent did the pilot work/not work?
31. Were cost and benefit data included as part of the decision-making
process?
32. If the pilot did not work, are there any potentially beneficial results that
can be drawn from this pilot?
33. Was there a plan for evaluation and was it followed?
34. Were evaluation and measurement criteria identified?
35. Was a methodology or tracking system for data collection defined?
36. Were the tasks involved in that methodology carefully defined?
37.


Pages:
761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785