SEARCH
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Prev | Current Page 774 | Next

Margaret K. Kulpa, Kent A. Johnson

"Interpreting the CMMI: A Process Improvement Approach, Second Edition"

Were evaluation conclusions clearly stated and well supported?
38. Is suffi cient evidence presented to support the conclusions drawn?
39. How confident are you in all of the results of the pilot?
40. Do we need to repilot?
Implement
41. Were evaluation results used in a decision to implement?
42. Were alternatives to the pilot concept explored during planning for
implementation?
43. In the decision making regarding implementation, are costs and benefits
addressed?
44. Is there a discussion in the decision making of potential savings, or of
monetary impact of implementation/nonimplementation?
45. In the decision-making process, were costs and benefits, and other insights
gained during the conduct of the pilot, as well as possible alternatives,
addressed?
46. Was implementation based on the original pilot methodology, or modifi-
cations to it?
47. Were cost-benefit and schedule considerations adjusted due to any such
modifications?
48. Were accurate cost and benefit data kept during implementation and
use?
49. Was a comparison made between estimated versus actual costs, benefits,
schedule improvement, and quality?
50.


Pages:
762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786