Focus should be on service discovery, analysis,
and architecture decisions that can influence a service??™s structure, behavior, and its relationship
to its supporting environment.
On the other hand, planning for the service life cycle run-time season is simply a matter
of describing the progression of services in production from one state to another. The strategy
for the life cycle run-time season should include various scenarios that depict the behavior of
services when they face expected and unexpected business and technology events.
SERVICE WORKFLOW STYLES. Obviously, workflows provide viable opportunities to assess
service development costs and also articulate the various operational options that can be depicted
by various evolution scenarios in a production environment. But how should a chosen service life
cycle strategy communicate service behavior? How should service structures such as aggregated,
autonomous, and distributed formations be depicted by a service life cycle? How can various
service progression scenarios be illustrated along the service life cycle timeline? The answers to
these questions can be found by examining the following service workflow styles and studying
the methods to accurately describe the evolution of an organization??™s service-oriented assets. At
this point, six distinct workflow styles are presented that can contribute to the foundation of an
organization??™s service-oriented strategy:
??? Single workflow style
??? Multiple workflow style
??? Workflow decomposition style
??? Workflow consolidation style
??? Conditional workflow style
??? Time-machine workflow style
Single Workflow Style.
Pages:
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120